Yeah, it seems you have the necessary qualification to comment on the subject. The kind with over a decade's experience in the industry and a degree in sports science. Makes me wonder what kind of an expert you are. I already showed him how to get to the goal. You blatantly disregarding the fact that a training routine should be constructed according to the goal Even as a strong athlete who can do 25 strict HSPU, pushups remain relevant for me they remain relevant for him. If their tendons are developed to a high degree and they have the necessary strength to do 100 pushups per day in a relatively easy manner, what is the point of doing 100 pushups? When you make things up in order to tear down an argument that nobody made, it's called a straw man argument. See the bit in italics? Literally nobody said that. As I reiterate, it's not a strength adaptation.ĭoing 100 pushups per day in multiple sets when each set has high intensity and high reps is recipe for tendinopathy. In fact, a quick trip to the 1RM calculator shows that his calculated max bench (using a 34kg bench as stand-in for his 33.92kg pushup) is 45kg. See above:Īchieving that bench press is more a stability and familiarity goal than a strength goal. We are not seeking to induce a strength adaptation. Strength adaptation are better induced by performing high-load resistance training. So this 100 pushups/day to get better at bench presses is nonsense. Further research is necessary to determine how frequently one needs to lift in the leftward portion of the repetition continuum to elicit maximal 1RM increases.Īt our current understanding, it is better to use lower reps/higher intensity type of strength training to increase 1rm max. Some researchers have proposed that the periodic “practice” of lifting with heavy loads is sufficient to maximize strength adaptations, but this hypothesis remains speculative. The apparent dose–response relationship provides further evidence for the causality of the adaptation. When considered in total, the literature does seem to support the existence of a “strength zone” for increasing 1RM, consistent with the concept of a repetition continuum. i think this quote accurately summarizes the strength part: but the research paper is very interesting. I dont think we are looking at hypertrophy here. We do not frown on weights or barbells as another tool for training. No advertising / Limited Self-promotion - See full self promotion rulesīodyweight Fitness is for redditors who like to use their own body to train, from the simple pullups, pushups, and squats to the advanced bodyweight movements like the planche, one arm chin-ups, or single leg squats.Any post that does not conform may be removed with no warning. Provoke discussion (see the full guidelines for details).These are serious topics that should be addressed by a qualified therapist and/or a nutritionist. Additionally, no body image, mental health, or minor diet advice either. No medical, injury, or pain related posts (try /r/AskDocs or see a sports orthopedic doc or sports physical therapist).Use the search, and read the FAQ and the /r/fitness FAQ before posting.Read the Frequently Asked Questions page! Posting Rules See the BWF Wiki for more programs Welcome to /r/bodyweightfitness! □ New to BWF but not new to fitness? Try the Recommended Routine (RR)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |